British judge rejects Julian Assange's request to sit with his lawyers during extradition hearing

A British judge has denied WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange's application to sit next to his lawyers, rather than in the dock, during his extradition hearing.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. Source: AFP

Julian Assange's father has slammed a British judge's refusal to let the WikiLeaks founder sit with his lawyers at his extradition hearing in London.

Australian John Shipton says his son is experiencing "psychological torture" as he bids against US extradition in Woolwich Crown Court.

He says District Judge Vanessa Baraitser denying Assange's request to leave the dock and sit with his lawyers in the court is "another failure of due process".
Julian Assange's father John Shipton (centre) speaks to the media.
Julian Assange's father John Shipton (centre) speaks to the media. Source: AP
"You see that this ends up as a continuance of the psychological torture of Julian that's continued (to be) ramped up over 10 years," Mr Shipton said.

"So the beginning of the week saw Julian strip-searched three times, handcuffed nine times, put in five different holding cells and his court reports and court work confiscated by prison authorities.

"Ending the week, as we've explained, (there was) refusal of the judge to allow him to move out of the glass box into the body of the court so he could be equally armed as due process requires."
Judge Baraitser ruled that Assange didn't need leave the dock and it was "proportionate and sensible" for him to privately speak with his lawyers in the holding cells.

The judge was prepared to allow regular stoppages so he could do that even if the three-week hearing stretched out to six weeks.

"If that results from the current three weeks for which they are listed stretching to a much longer period then I am very happy to accommodate that," Judge Baraitser said.
Editor in Chief of Wikileaks Kristin Hrafnsson (R) with Wikileaks Section Editor Joseph Farrell (L) outside Woolwich Crown Court in London.
Editor in Chief of Wikileaks Kristin Hrafnsson (R) with Wikileaks Section Editor Joseph Farrell (L) outside Woolwich Crown Court in London. Source: EPA
Defence barrister Mark Summers earlier argued that defendants are still in custody of the court even if they weren't physically in "that glass cabinet".

"One can be in custody even if one is out wandering in the concourse, enjoying the delights of the court canteen," Mr Summers said.

WikiLeaks editor Kristinn Hrafnsson claimed the ruling was written before the application had even been made, indicating Assange wouldn't get a fair trial.
"And I am absolutely outraged," Hrafnsson said outside court.

"Even in America accused murders sit beside their lawyers in the courtroom without shackles."

Assange has been charged in the US with 17 counts of violating the Espionage Act and one of conspiring to commit computer intrusion over the leaking and publishing of thousands of classified US diplomatic and military files in 2010.

The charges carry a total sentence of 175 years' imprisonment.


Share
3 min read
Published 28 February 2020 8:56am
Updated 28 February 2020 9:09am


Share this with family and friends