Key Points
- The measure asks the International Court of Justice to lay out nations' obligations for protecting Earth's climate.
- The resolution is co-sponsored by more than 130 member states.
- Climate experts caution that global mean temperatures may surge to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels as soon as 2030-35
The UN General Assembly adopted by consensus, and to cheers a resolution calling for the world body's top court to outline legal obligations related to climate change.
Pushed for years by Vanuatu and Pacific islander youth, the measure asks the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to lay out nations' obligations for protecting Earth's climate, and the legal consequences they face if they don't.
"Together, you are making history," UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said, emphasising that even if non-binding, an opinion from the International Court of Justice "would assist the General Assembly, the UN and member states to take the bolder and stronger climate action that our world so desperately needs."
Ultimately co-sponsored by more than 130 member states, the resolution had been widely expected to be approved.
Its adoption sends "a loud and clear message not only around the world, but far into the future," Vanuatu's Prime Minister Ishmael Kalsakau told the assembly.
The resolution asks the ICJ to clarify the "obligations of states under international law to ensure the protection of the climate system."
Vanuatu's Prime Minister Ishmael Kalsakau addresses the general assembly hall of the United Nations (UN) headquarters in New York. The UN General Assembly adopted by consensus a landmark resolution calling for the world body's top court to lay out nations' legal obligations in combatting climate change. Source: Getty / Ed Jones
The government of Vanuatu started lobbying for the climate resolution in 2021, after a campaign initiated by a group of students from a university in Fiji in 2019.
A week ago, the UN's panel of climate experts (IPCC) warned that global average temperatures could reach 1.5 C above the pre-industrial era by as early as 2030-2035, underlining the need for drastic action this decade.
While nations have no legal obligation under the 2015 Paris Agreement to meet emission reduction targets, backers of the new climate resolution hope other instruments, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights or the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, could offer some pathways for enforcement.
Describing the new resolution as "the most important global move since the Paris Agreement feels accurate," Shaina Sadai of the Union for Concerned Scientists advocacy group told AFP, adding that it was an "incredibly important next step" particularly for guidance for "lawsuits being brought in courts around the world.
LISTEN TO
Pacific youth push for climate justice to be looked at by world's highest court
SBS News
05/10/202210:41
The adoption comes the same day that cases opened before the European Court of Human Rights against France and Switzerland over alleged failings to protect the environment, marking the first time governments are in the court's dock for alleged climate change inaction.
Although ICJ opinions are not binding, they carry significant legal and moral weight, and are often taken into account by national courts.
The adoption marked an emotional moment for the Pacific youth who spearheaded the initiative.
"This was an opportunity to do something bigger than ourselves, bigger than our fears, something important for our future," said Cynthia Houniuhi, president of the group Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change.