Too early to tell if third intifada brewing in Jerusalem

Tensions between Israel and the Palestinians are again reaching boiling point as Israeli forces clamp down East Jerusalem to stop a recent wave of attacks.

Too early to tell if third intifada brewing in Jerusalem

Too early to tell if third intifada brewing in Jerusalem

The escalating violence has prompted questions whether a new intifida, or uprising, is imminent.

Clashes between Israel and the Palestinians have simmered for decades but sometimes intensify and become something more.

On two occasions, the violence has spiked into full-blown uprisings, with a combined death toll of almost 7-thousand people.

The first intifada took place across the West Bank and Gaza Strip from late 1987 and lasted almost six years.

The second spanned from September 2000 to 2005.

With tensions currently mounting around Jerusalem's Old City, there are now fears of a third, with media agencies calling it a possible Leaderless Intifada.

Former Palestinian negotiator Khaled Elgindy says the key features of past intifadas are still missing.

"It's probably premature to call it the third intifada, because, the pieces that are needed, I don't quite see them being in place. You need a mass mobilisation to be sustained. It needs to be sustained over time. And that requires organisation by the political actors on the ground, and we don't really see that yet."

That organisation is unlikely, with little or no cohesion between Gaza's Hamas government and Palestinian authorities in the West Bank, crucial to the past two intifadas.

Meanwhile, the Jerusalem area is under its most serious clampdown in 10 years, with hundreds of Israeli officials deployed in a bid to stem a wave of gun and knife attacks.

Palestinian protesters have clashed with Israeli troops over the increased security presence.

Violence has also been partly triggered by Palestinians' anger over what they see as increased Jewish encroachment on the Al-Aqsa mosque compound.

The recent flare-up has seen deaths on both sides, but the number of Palestinians killed continues to outweigh the Israeli death toll.

The Palestinian ambassador to the United Nations, Riyad Mansour, says imposing more security is counter-productive.

Mr Mansour believes the Israeli government needs to de-escalate the situation.

"Those militaristic forms by the Israeli occupying authorities in bringing tens of thousands of soldiers and policemen and weapons in the hands of the settlers, and even the formation of new militias, as was suggested by the mayor of West Jerusalem, in asking Jews to carry weapons. They have to withdraw all these militaristic forms against our people."

Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu has told parliament Israel wants to finally strike a peace deal with the Palestinians.

"Israel wants peace. I want peace. I'm interested in the immediate renewal of peace talks with our Palestinian neighbours without preconditions. It will be a tough negotiation because, in order to achieve peace, the Palestinians will have to finally recognise the Jewish national state's right to exist."

But the Palestinian Authority president is refusing to take any blame for ongoing tensions in the region.

Mahmoud Abbas wants the United Nations to deploy a protective force in East Jerusalem to help quell the violence.

"We're not aggressive against anybody, and we don't like any aggression against our people. We're asking for the whole world, from the United Nations, we will not continue with the situation of this occupation. I will not give up to the policy of the occupier, which has been used by the Israelis, killing our children in cold blood."

Alex Ryvchen, from the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, has criticised Mr Abbas's comments, calling them "poisonous".

He says he believes peace can only be struck when Mr Abbas helps reduce the rate of attacks, rather than incite more.

"The minute that that sort of incitement stops, that sort of propaganda, those sorts of conspiracy theories, stop and stop poisoning the minds of Palestinian youths, then we'll have a situation where we can have normal relations, where we can have normal negotiations towards the achievement of a Palestinian state. And it will come not through violence, but it will come through bilateral negotiations. That's the only path. The line that the Palestinian Authority has no control over what's happening is utter nonsense."

But Khaled Elgindy says the only real way another intifada can be avoided is by creating an independent Palestine first.

"If you want to sort of minimise the violence and give Palestinians hope, then you have to show a serious way forward that will eventually lead to the creation of an independent Palestinian state, and I think that has to begin in Jerusalem. The Jerusalem issue has been put off for far too long, and it is now sort of begging to be addressed."


Share
5 min read
Published 15 October 2015 2:16pm
Updated 17 October 2015 8:05am
By Omar Dabbagh

Tags

Share this with family and friends